CancerResearchInformation.com

by Joanne Clodfelter from Ohio, US

Daily we are assaulted with pink ribbons, yellow ribbons, and other means of showing “support” for “victims” of cancer and other serious diseases. Charities beg us to give them money to “wipe out” and “battle” diseases which can cause death. The cancer industry itself is such a big business and so dehumanizing, the charities have taken on the role of putting a face on those who experience disease, because the medical community refuses to treat its patients as anything other than disease-ridden bodies while effectively disempowering the person in the name of profits.

Comment: Joanne indeed comes down strongly on the entire conventional medicine community and cancer industry, and for good reason, too - she suffered badly under the system, and would have lost her life if she did not walk away and take responsibility for her own healing.

Hers is a powerful story, and I am so glad that she is around to tell it to us. Sadly, for every Joanne, there are hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of others who walk through the trapdoor and don’t survive. That’s what makes education so important.

I look forward to compiling more of such testimonials from brave souls who shunned the medical system and defeated their cancer prognosis.

Cancer treatment is big, big business in the US. Charities are a big, big business in the US. The union between the medical communities and the big charities are a marriage made in heaven. For the most part, neither the medical community nor the charities will benefit if there is ever a cure found for cancer. So the medical community robs you of your power and dignity with brutal surgery, radiation, and chemopoison, making lots and lots of money off of the pain and suffering of individuals and in many cases, exacerbating the pain and suffering and hastening death. Then the big business charities step in and call those who experienced the disease “survivors,” “victims” and “heroes” while collecting money from the pain of the patient and his/her loved ones and the loved ones of the deceased. Modern medicine robs you of your dignity, and then the charities try to give it back. And both are out to make money off of you while maintaining the status quo.

Here’s an example of how charities maintain the status quo. One of the largest cancer charities in the U.S. offers makeup, hair, and skin care advice to women going through chemopoison. The night I went, I was given a makeup bag full of donated cosmetics. The program was conducted by paid hospital employees and volunteers who sat next to each participant while working with her on how to put on the makeup. They also had a table full of donated wigs and scarves. The participants looked terrible, were in pain, and wanted answers to questions about their chemo treatment. But unless the question was about makeup, the registered nurse quieted them and told them to speak to their doctor. My guess is that if the doctor had answered their questions to their satisfaction, they wouldn’t be asking a strange nurse! To me, this is an example of how a charity steps in after the individual has been brutalized and depersonalized, tries acts like it’s doing something positive by picking up the pieces while in reality, they’re totally supporting the brutality of the medical community, instead of offering humane alternatives.

Now what if this charity, with all of its vast resources, would offer a program to help people who have been told they have cancer, but have yet to make any decisions about treatment, or feel they need more information than the doctor is giving them? The charity would step in before decisions were made about treatment and offer information that doctors can’t or won’t give to them. ? (When I asked the oncologist about the side effects of chemopoison, his response was “Look it up on the internet. There are too many for me to talk about.”) The non-profit could offer seminars which empower people with information. For example, where they discuss what questions to ask the doctor, how to know if your doctor is really advocating for you, when to change doctors, the reality of the chemopoison and how it will affect you, how the surgery will affect you, the actual research showing the effectiveness of the chemopoison, the importance of nutrition and exercise, the role of emotions in disease, and other alternatives the doctors don’t want to talk about. This way the non-profit could be a true advocate for the individual and empower him/her before the brutal effects of treatment. And the individual could make an informed choice. Of course, this would not win the charities any friends (translated: money) among the majority of doctors whose income depends on surgery and chemopoison, and the drug companies who make big, big bucks off the illness of individuals.

Your doctor will give you a very sanitized book about the effects of chemo treatment, either from his hospital or a cancer charity. But the information given is so watered down, with nice little cartoon pictures, and makes everything you are going to go through on chemopoison as not much more challenging than a walk in the park. The information they give you in no way portrays the brutality of the treatment.

Have you ever heard of chemo poop? Probably not. That’s when your body is trying to get rid of the feces full of chemopoison, but it can’t. So you have to manually press around your anus to let the poop out. I’ve never seen that in any books on how to prepare for chemopoison.

Or the fact that food tastes like chewing a dishrag after you have chemo because you lose all sense of flavor.

Or that you look like an Auschwitz survivor when you’re on chemopoison?

Or that people lose teeth from chemopoison?

Nor do they tell you that chempoison depletes your system so much that it’s an effort to go up and down stairs without becoming breathless and fatigued.

Or that at a major university hospital in Ohio, more than half of the admissions on any given day are from bad reactions to chemopoison?

You pay them to poison you, and you pay them to get you well enough so that they can give your more chemopoison. All this for a treatment that has an overall effectiveness rate of 4%. What a deal!

But gee, if they did tell you these things, perhaps fewer people would sign up for chemo poison and the doctors and drug companies would lose money!

But this is an example of how a vastly wealthy charitable organization could make a major contribution to changing the paradigm of cancer treatment in the U.S by being very honest and factual in a way that doctors refuse to. But they choose not to, probably because it would step on too many powerful toes. And face it: charities make their money off of pain, suffering and death. We don’t have the American Common Cold Society because who would contribute to a condition that we all know everyone will survive?

And honestly, if you came down with a serious disease and had no money for treatment, do you think these charities would call you up by name and offer you treatment for free because you participated in all their walks and donated money? There is no correlation between how much an individual contributes and supports a charity and how much that charity will give back to that same individual. Charities are big business, and their product is soliciting money so they can continue to exist and grow, while maintaining the medical status quo, which is offering support to those who have been robbed of their dignity or killed by brutal medical treatment. So why would the charities want to find a cure for anything?

(See articles on www.preventcancer.com about the huge wealth of the American Cancer Society.)

There’s an old adage that goes something like this: if laws changed behavior, all of the jails would be empty. I think the same thing applies to charities. If money could buy a cure, one would have been found long ago. But just as new laws only make more and more people criminals, the more money you give to charities, the less reason they have to ever find a cure for a disease.

The real victims of cancer are the patients. But they are not victimized by disease; they are victimized by a medical system whose gold standard is chemo-poison, which, according to an Australian study, has an overall effectiveness rate of 4%. Even in cancers in which chemo-poison has been proved to be ineffective, it is the only treatment oncologists in the US are allowed by law.

Think if only 4% of the cars on the road were mechanically sound. What if only 4% of the houses built could withstand a simple rain or snowfall? Consumers would be outraged and Congress would get on the bandwagon to make sure that consumers had some protections. Certainly the automakers and the homebuilders would never be allowed to get away with a 4% effectiveness rate.

But somehow, the human body doesn’t rate as much government protection as a house or a car.

But the cancer doctors get away with pitiful effectiveness rates every single day, at the expense of millions of people who came to them in their pain and with good faith, in the hope that they could be helped at the worst time in their lives.

The medical community has a closed market with absolutely no concept of consumer choice or customer service. Once you step into their grid, you are bullied into ineffective treatments, subject to endless rounds of testing and appointments with no concern for your time or dignity, all with the goal of protecting the doctors from lawsuits, without any regard for the patient. And in the end, you are never healed by them. You are at best a survivor. Yes, you are a survivor—of brutal, ineffective treatment from an uncaring, but extremely wealthy medical system.

One figure suggests that oncologists make 80% of their income off of chemopoison. Why would they want anything to change?

And personally, if I was paid big bucks to deliver a product that has only a 4% effectiveness rate and often fatal, it would be unethical for me to continue to deliver that product. I would be unable to sleep at night.

Yet when it comes to human beings and human bodies, chemo poison hustlers (oncologists) get a green light to charge outrageous prices, often receiving huge money and benefits from drug companies, to deliver a therapy which some studies say 80% of oncologists would never take for themselves. In fact, if an oncologist ever recommends chemo-poison, say “Doc, let me see you take chemopoison for a couple hours and then I’ll make my decision.” What do you think the response would be? My guess is that it would be somewhere along the lines of “Hell no, I’m not putting that poison in my body—even if it is delivered by a friendly, smiling nurse wearing rubber gloves (because if she gets it on her skin it will eat it up.) So then you could reply “Doc, but you get to sit in a recliner and we’ll give you medicine to relax you while you’re getting your chemo-poison infusion. Doesn’t that sweeten the deal?” Just how many oncologists would sign up for this?

Cancer treatment is big, big business. Yet as advanced as we think our society is, why is it that billions and billions of dollars are spent on cancer treatment in the US, yet you’ll find doctors who treat the person as nothing more than a disease without any regard for causation, with as many suggested causes for cancer as there are stars in the sky? It is estimated that there are more people making money off of cancer treatment than there are who have cancer. Who can afford to cure it? And what if all these researchers are on the wrong track? What if there is an explanation backed by irrefutable research for the question of why cancer happens to some people and not others, and how they can cure themselves of cancer?

Consider this: our human bodies were designed for survival. What if in most cases of cancer, many treatments, especially chemo-poison, interfere with our bodies’ natural ability to heal? And if we survive cancer, it’s in spite of the chemo-poison?

There are two main reasons that an official cure will for cancer will never be found: 1) because those employed by the cancer industry would find themselves out of jobs and 2) because scientific “research,” usually bought and paid for by the drug companies, considers all of us no more than a collection of similar cells, with no acknowledgement of our uniqueness as individuals and our own personal stories.

Every one of us in a unique individual. Each and every one of us has our own special story that makes us who we are. Beginning in the womb, our stories began. Were we wanted or unwanted babies? Did our parents love each other? Did our mothers look forward to our birth, or dread it? And from the moment of conception, and every moment thereon, with every thought, word, and deed, we are writing our stories. No two people on Earth will ever have the exact same story. And what if disease is our response to elements of our own stories?

Dr Ryke Gerhard Hamer was an internist in Germany in the 1970’s. He worked in a cancer clinic. After his son died unexpectedly, Dr. Hamer developed testicular cancer. He wondered if there was a correlation between his cancer and his son’s death. So he started talking to his patients and found in every case of cancer, it was preceded by an unexpected negative event (conflict shock) which he called a DHS (Dirk Hamer Syndrome) named after his deceased son Dirk. The conflict shock which precedes the cancer is very individual and very personally subjective. For example, one woman may respond to her husband’s sudden request for a divorce as “good riddance.” Another woman may experience a great loss, given the same situation, and develop cancer. What constitutes a conflict shock is based on the unique elements of our life story.

For the past 30 years, despite losing his medical license and being imprisoned and exiled, Dr. Hamer has developed ironclad laws pertaining to disease which take into account the fact that Mother Nature designed our bodies for survival, there is nothing random occuring in Nature, and all disease is the result of a conflict shock.

You see, we are all individuals. We all have our own stories. We are writing our stories each moment of the day. When we get a disease, according to Doctor Hamer it is our body’s survival mechanism that responds to our unique challenges of being human. Dr. Hamer’s research proved that every conflict shock has three dimensions: it literally impacts our brain with a lesion, it impacts our emotions, and depending on where it impacts our brain it directly affects a particular organ which will be considered “disease.”

Dr. Hamer’s work also takes into account whether or not you are left or right handed, pre or post menopausal, and laterality, which is where the shock makes the impact on your brain.

For example, breast cancer represents the loss of a loved one from the nest. A right-handed woman will develop breast cancer on the left side if the loss is a parent or child. Why? Because a right handed woman holds the baby in her left arm so she can feed him. In a right handed woman, cancer on the right side would represent the loss of anyone other than parent or child. This could be spouse, partner, boss. Even the loss of a pet could affect the breast; if the pet is “my baby” for a right handed woman, the cancer would be on the left side. If the pet is “my buddy” the cancer would be on the right side. The exact opposite is true for a left handed person.

How many drug companies research this kind of detail?

In German New Medicine, the copyrighted name Dr. Hamer has given to his work, there are two types of tumors: conflict active and healing. For example, the colon develops tumors when the individual is in the conflict active state. After the individual resolves the conflict, the tumor disintegrates with the help of bacteria. In other tissue, like the ovaries and prostate, cells die off (necrosis) during the conflict active phase, and as soon as the conflict resolves, a healing “tumor” develops to replenish tissues lost during the necrotic phase. And unless the tumor mechanically interferes with a vital body function, it is harmless and there’s no need for surgical removal. The majority of the time, our bodies can and will heal themselves.

In Dr. Hamer’s work, the terms malignant and benign are irrelevant. The question is whether or not it’s a conflict active tumor or a healing tumor. Dr. Hamer’s research identifies whether it is a conflict active or healing tumor depending on the organ involved.

He also has found that there is no such thing as metastasis, only additional conflict shocks which are often brought on by the medical community!

So when our bodies develop unexpected cells (tumors) or lose cells through necrosis, they are telling us “Hold on, we’ve got an unexpected chapter in our life story here. Let’s do everything we can to help you survive the conflict and get back to normal and yes, HEAL.” (That word that has become a big no-no among the medical community.)

We are our stories. Modern medicine has forgotten the person and the story in the name of “state of the art” treatment and testing. Maybe there’s a reason God didn’t make our bodies of plexiglass so that we can see what is going on at every moment. What if modern medicine, with all of its testing and chemo poison and fear mongering has taken a perfectly good system of survival developed by Mother Nature and proven by Dr. Hamer and used it to totally disempower those unfortunate enough to seek medical treatment at what is probably the worst time in their lives?

Your body loves you. There is no war going on within the body, as the medical community would have you believe. The war is between the human being and the medical community; which totally disregards our own uniqueness and our own stories. We are always writing our own stories. Dr. Hamer’s works allows us to write the next chapter in our own stories.

So, you may wonder why you haven’t heard about Dr. Hamer’s work. Ask your oncologist, ask your favorite charity, ask your favorite drug company.

“Ask your Doctor” has become the mantra of the 21st century. You’re supposed to ask your doctor before every diet, exercise, lifestyle, program, and about any shift in moods. But just because an individual has graduated from a medical school does not insure competence, nor does it ensure s/he has your best interests in mind and is probably practicing defensive medicine at best, and above all, this “expert” (usually at pushing pills) doesn’t know you as well as you know yourself.

The saddest thing is that the medical community has take our definition of health out of our own hands, and pronouncing themselves the only ones capable of determining whether we are sick or healthy. We’ve all heard stories of where people were feeling great, went to the doctor for a routine examination, and were told they had something very seriously wrong with them—and then ended up being very sick and mutilated after being “treated” by a doctor. We also have heard stories of those who feel very sick, but the doctor tells them there is nothing wrong with them.

It’s time to take the responsibility for our health out of the people who are out to make money off of us, and back into our own hands. It’s the ONLY path to healing and health. When we’re empowered, we feel good. We can never feel good living a life at the hands of a doctor inside of an uncaring medical system.

For more information about German New Medicine, visit www.germannewmedicine.ca.

A New Glossary

Victims

• Those who comply with an oncologist’s recommendation to treat them, all the way to the grave.

• Those who expect the doctors will take care of them and believe the doctors are doing everything for them, rather than understanding that the majority of the doctors’ efforts are purely defensive, to protect themselves from lawsuits

Heroes

• Individuals who stand up to their doctors and become challenging, non-compliant people, who don’t accept the oncologist’s systematic poisoning by chemicals that are only 4% effective.

• Individuals who can turn away from their doctors threats and bullying to alternatives besides chemopoisoning for treatment

Perpetrators

• Doctors who make hundreds of thousands of dollars poisoning people with an effectiveness rate of only 4%.

• Doctors who systematically poison individuals, knowing they are doing more harm than good.

• Doctors who refuse to consider any other therapy for cancer except surgery, radiation, and chemopoison (cut, slash, and burn).

• Doctors who refuse to consider the person and treat the human being as nothing but a receptacle for disease which must be exorcised, no different than the witch burning that took place hundreds of years ago.

Things You Doctor Won’t Tell You Prior to Treatment

1. If the doctor screws up, s/he may or may not take responsibility for fixing the problem. But if s/he does fix it, you’ll pay again.

2. If you try to go to another doctor to fix a problem caused by another doctor, don’t be surprised if you’re told to go back to the original doctor.

3. Once you have a cancer diagnosis, be prepared to be a pariah to any doctor you go to for treatment that has nothing to do with cancer. There is such a fear of cancer in the medical community, that you will find yourself being treated like damaged goods by doctors other than oncologists.

4. If you decide to get treated out of town, you will be locked out of every hospital in your hometown. Even if you arrange for coordination of care between a local doctor and an out of town doctor, be prepared when big doctor egos get in the way and you’re shipped out of town, against your will, for treatment.

5. If you decide to have treatment at a teaching hospital, most of your face time will be with inexperienced, uncaring, twenty-something students who lack commitment and wisdom. To them, you are just a grade. Just try to get an answer out of the pack that makes its rounds. “I need to talk to my team” is their cop-out answer. But you will still pay full price to the hospital for the kids to be involved in your treatment. You have the right to ask that students not be involved in your care, but the hospital will never tell you that.

Read another of Joanne’s articles, titled Ovarian Cancer And Peritoneal Tumors - Healing Through German New Medicine, by clicking here.

Related posts:

1. Ovarian Cancer And Peritoneal Tumors - Healing Through German New Medicine by Joanne Clodfelter from Ohio, US According to Dr. Hamer...
2. Choosing An Alternative Cancer Treatment - How A Breast Cancer Sufferer Made Her Decision When one is diagnosed with the much-dreaded disease called "cancer",...
3. Cancer Treatment - Comparing Natural and Conventional Methods The way cancer is treated depends very much on how...
4. Conventional Medicine’s “War on Cancer” - Examining the Truth So much is always said and published about the supposed...
5. An Example of A Natural Cancer Treatment Protocol If you are familiar with natural cancer protocols, or so-called...